's still unknown to the author, and the reasons are obscure, murder Inspector of NOCS Samuel Donatoni, killed in Riofreddo in '97 in a blitz in the early stages of the seizure Soffiantini, although they were handed down two judgments, both definitive on the case. Two decisions, moreover, offer truth 'diametrically opposte.Un judicial paradox that is told by a judge, even by the court which, departing from the sentence which had condemned the seizure of banned entrepreneur Giuseppe Soffiantini for the killing of' Inspector of NOCs, supported the thesis of 'friendly fire' by completing the murder Giovanni Farina, one of the captors, tried a second time after the end of his hiding in Australia.Mario Almeida, a former magistrate of assault, now presiding judge of Civitavecchia, in 'The Mystery of State strange death of the inspector Donatoni '(publisher Aliberti - Preface by Furio Colombo), takes the reader, does not impose his truth', but making him ask questions, in the path that led him to overturn the results of a series of investigations and Reconstruction contained in a sentence. "I had approached this process - says Almeida - the spirit of remaking something already 'done and copy the sentence had already been' upheld by the Supreme Court." And instead, the discovery of acts of a sealed envelope containing photographs of fifty spots of blood near the area where the body was found Donatoni opened a shocking scenario. "Following those tracks - says the judge - it was clear that the inspector was shot elsewhere and his body dragged there. At that point there was not even a drop of blood. I was amazed - recalls Almeida -. The serious thing 'that no one had ever mentioned that I found those spots that were destroyed after the comparison with the blood of the bandits. "Hence the reopening of the investigation, an assessment office, summoning of witnesses and never heard confirms that intuition linked to photos of blood stains. "The Court's experts - reveals Almeida - agreed that the shot had left a gun in use in NOCs involved in the operation organized for the fake ransom payment (and not from the Kalashnikov one of the bandits, as he considered conviction of the perpetrators) and a short distance of 40-60 cm. The body had been positioned in the direction of the shots of the bandit. From the time of the shooting when he was found passed Donatoni 15 minutes, fatal, that the inspector could not be helped. But 'cause this whole ruse to not bring out the truth'?, Almeida asks: "carry one who is dying for 200 yards, give false testimony ... Why 'does not even admit the accident?" In the book, the magistrate criticism does not spare even the public prosecutor of the case Soffiantini who took the opinion of the police. "The consequence of an American prosecutor, which depends on the executive - will update the topic Almeida -, could be the proliferation of unjust sentences such as the condemnation of the bandits for the murder Donatoni. The prosecutor is not 'the lawyer for the police. What legitimate and its independence 'and that' a body which should help to establish the truth 'and not the condemnation of the alleged person indicated by the police. The prosecutor must have a culture of jurisdiction. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment